Pattaya One News
Home » Paul McCartney Warns Against AI Exploiting Artists’ Work
Celebrity News Entertainment International News

Paul McCartney Warns Against AI Exploiting Artists’ Work

Paul McCartney Warns Against AI Exploiting Artists' Work

Sir Paul McCartney has voiced his concerns regarding proposed changes to copyright law that could enable “rip-off” technology, potentially jeopardizing the livelihoods of musicians and artists. Speaking to BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, McCartney emphasized the need for protections in light of the increased use of artificial intelligence to develop models using creators’ online content.

The concerning updates come after a report from the government indicating that the new laws would allow AI developers to utilize creators’ work unless rights holders opt out.

Reflecting on his early career in Liverpool, McCartney stressed the importance of creating music for both passion and financial security. He warned that if these legislative changes were implemented, it might deter aspiring artists from pursuing their craft, leading to a significant “loss of creativity.”

The government claims the new framework aims to provide creators with “real control” and transparency in relation to their work. However, McCartney expressed apprehension that this development could unleash a “Wild West” scenario regarding copyright protections, leaving young artists vulnerable.

He lamented, “You get young guys and girls writing beautiful songs, yet they don’t own them. Anyone can just take their work without consequences. The reality is, the money has to go somewhere—why shouldn’t it go to the person who created it?”

McCartney urged the government to reconsider its approach, saying, “You’re the government; you’re supposed to protect us.”

Recently, McCartney and fellow Beatle Ringo Starr employed AI to isolate John Lennon’s vocals from an old demo to craft a new song, “Now and Then.” McCartney acknowledged the potential utility of AI but reiterated, “It shouldn’t rip creative people off. That makes no sense.”

Currently, the government is consulting on proposals allowing AI companies to utilize online material without copyright permissions for data mining and text generation. Critics argue that an “opt-out” system would be overly burdensome for individual creators, making it impractical to manage their rights effectively.

Baroness Kidron, a cross-bench peer, is set to propose an “opt-in” model in the House of Lords this week, offering artists more control over their work.

Tom Kiehl, the CEO of UK Music, criticized the government’s plans, warning that they could significantly harm the music industry, which contributes over £120 billion to the economy. He expressed skepticism about the feasibility of artists opting out of AI training, deeming the inclusion of an opt-out option inadequate.

In response, a government spokesperson affirmed the quality of the UK’s music scene and the intention to create a copyright framework that safeguards artists while also accommodating AI innovation. They expressed eagerness to gather feedback from the music industry before proceeding with any changes.

Sir Paul recently concluded his Got Back tour, performing in France, Spain, and Brazil, culminating at London’s O2 Arena.

Credit: BBC

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at [email protected]

Related posts

Pattaya One New Thailand, your go-to source for global and local news, alongside effective business advertising opportunities, tailored to the vibrant city of Pattaya.
Translate »