Trial starts for BBC journalist reporting Thailand crime


Trial starts for BBC journalist reporting Thailand crime

A British BBC journalist appeared in court in Thailand today for the start of a criminal defamation trial brought by a lawyer who was featured in an investigation about foreigners being scammed out of their retirement homes.

Jonathan Head, the BBC’s Southeast Asia correspondent, faces up to five years in jail on the popular tourist island of Phuket, where the alleged scam took place.

Rights groups have said the case exposes how Thailand’s broad defamation and computer crime laws scupper investigative journalism and make it difficult to uncover wrongdoing in an endemically corrupt country.

The prosecution was sparked by a 2015 report by Head detailing how two foreign retirees had Phuket properties stolen from them by a network of criminals and corrupt officials.

One of the victims, British national Ian Rance, is a joint defendant in the prosecution. Both have pleaded not guilty.

The man bringing the prosecution is Pratuan Thanarak, a local lawyer who featured in the BBC’s report looking at how Rance lost USD1.2 million (THB40 million) worth of properties.

According to the report, Pratuan admitted on tape to certifying Rance’s signature without him being present, a move which helped the British retiree’s then-wife, a Thai citizen, transfer his properties out of his name.

She was later convicted and jailed for the scam.

A copy of Pratuan’s complaint seen by AFP alleges that the BBC’s report caused him to be “defamed, insulted or hated.” It does not detail whether he notarized the signature without Rance being present.

Pratuan declined to speak about the case on the way into court. He warned gathered photographers that he would file a lawsuit against anyone who published images of him.

Neither Head nor Rance spoke to reporters on their way into the Phuket court on Wednesday.

In a previous statement, the BBC has said it “stands by its journalism” and that they “intend to clear the name of our correspondent.”

Rance and Head face one charge of criminal defamation, which carries up to two years in jail.

Head faces an additional charge under Thailand’s Computer Crimes Act, a broadly-worded law which forbids uploading “false data” online and carries a five-year maximum jail penalty.

Unlike most countries where defamation is a civil crime, in Thailand it is a criminal offense.

Private citizens can also launch their own prosecutions and they are not forced to pay costs if they lose.

Similar cases have been brought in recent years.

Local news site Phuketwan closed down in 2015 after running out of money in its successful bid to defeat a suit brought by Thailand’s navy.

Andrew Drummond, a British crime reporter, left the country the same year because of multiple cases brought by those he exposed, as did British labor rights activist Andy Hall in 2016.

  • Reads Like a Monty Python sketch, Scam, Scam, Scam, Scam, Scam, scam, scam scam, SCAM, wonderful scam!

    • Customer:
      What have you got?
      Well, there’s egg and bacon,
      egg sausage and bacon
      Egg and spam
      Egg, bacon and spam
      Egg, bacon, sausage and spam
      Spam, bacon, sausage and spam
      Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
      Spam, sausage, spam, spam, spam, bacon, spam tomato and spam
      Spam, spam, spam, egg and spam
      Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam, spam and spam.
      (Choir: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Lovely Spam! Lovely Spam!)
      Or Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a mornay sauce
      served in a provencale manner with shallots and aubergines
      garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and spam.
      Have you got anything without spam?
      Well, the spam, eggs, sausage and spam
      That’s not got much spam in it
      I don’t want any spam!
      Why can’t she have eggs, bacon, spam and sausage?
      That’s got spam in it!
      Hasn’t got much spam in it as spam, eggs, sausage and spam has it?
      (Choir: Spam! Spam! Spam!…)
      Could you do me eggs, bacon, spam and sausage without the spam, then?
      What do you mean ‘Iiiiiiiiiich’? I don’t like spam!
      (Choir: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!)
      Waitress (to choir):
      Shut up!
      (Choir: Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!)
      Shut Up! Bloody Vikings!
      You can’t have egg, bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
      I don’t like spam!
      Shush dear, don’t have a fuss. I’ll have your spam. I love it,
      I’m having spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans,
      spam, spam, spam, and spam!
      (Choir: Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!)
      Shut Up!! Baked beans are off.
      Well, could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then?
      You mean spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam,
      spam and spam?
      Choir (intervening):
      Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!
      Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!
      Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam.
      Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!
      Spam spam spam spam!

      • paul

        wow u need to get a gik

        • Guest

          He is a gik.

  • Russian Carrot

    Why noone, who post news on this web-site ever bother to leave a link to the source of content?

  • Ken Anderson

    The BBC used to be a world renowned source of news, famed for it’s unbiased subjective reporting. Unfortunately now it has turned into a left wing national disgrace, peddling selective and very biased opinions.
    This poor excuse of a reporter deserves to be incarcerated for the maximum possible term, as do his superiors in their ivory towers in London. Self serving left wing plebs, the lot of them are!!